<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Speed Trap Highway 58 Lacrosse, VA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://highway58speedtrap.com/speed-trap-video/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://highway58speedtrap.com</link>
	<description>The Worst Speed Trap In Virginia Caught On Tape!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 23:16:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Snickers62</title>
		<link>http://highway58speedtrap.com/comment-page-3/#comment-692</link>
		<dc:creator>Snickers62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 23:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://highway58speedtrap.com/?page_id=7#comment-692</guid>
		<description>As you may know, Virginia is the only state that bans the use and sale of detectors. There is no evidence that the detector ban increases highway safety. Our nation’s fatality rates have fallen consistently for almost two decades. Virginia’s fatality rate has also fallen, but not any more dramatically than it has nationwide. Research has even shown that radar detector owners have a lower accident rate than motorists who do not own a detector. 

Maintaining the ban is not in the best interest of Virginians or visitors to the state. I know and know of people that will not drive in Virginia due to this ban. Unjust enforcement practices are not unheard of, and radar detectors can keep safe motorists from being exploited by abusive speed traps. Likewise, the ban has a negative impact on Virginia’s business community. Electronic distributors lose business to neighboring states and Virginia misses out on valuable sales tax revenue. 

Radar detector bans do not work. Research and experience show that radar detector bans do not result in lower accident rates, improved speed-limit compliance or reduce auto insurance expenditures.
• The Virginia radar detector ban is difficult and expensive to enforce. The Virginia ban diverts precious law enforcement resources from more important duties. 
• Radar detectors are legal in the rest of the nation, in all 49 other states. In fact, the first state to test a radar detector ban, Connecticut, repealed the law – it ruled the law was ineffective and unfair. It is time for our Virginia to join the rest of the nation. 
• It has never been shown that radar detectors cause accidents or even encourage motorists to drive faster than they would otherwise. The Yankelovich – Clancy – Shulman Radar Detector Study conducted in 1987, showed that radar detector users drove an average of 34% further between accidents (233,933 miles versus 174,554 miles) than non radar detector users. The study also showed that they have much higher seat belt use compliance. If drivers with radar detectors have fewer accidents, it follows that they have reduced insurance costs – it is counterproductive to ban radar detectors. 
• In a similar study performed in Great Britain by MORI in 2001 the summary reports that &quot;Users (of radar detectors) appear to travel 50% further between accidents than non-users. In this survey the users interviewed traveling on average 217,353 miles between accidents compared to 143,401 miles between accidents of those non-users randomly drawn from the general public.&quot; The MORI study also reported &quot;Three quarters agree, perhaps unsurprisingly, that since purchasing a radar detector they have become more conscious about keeping to the speed limit...&quot; and &quot;Three in five detector users claim to have become a safer driver since purchasing a detector.&quot; 
• Modern radar detectors play a significant role in preventing accidents and laying the technology foundation for the Safety Warning System® (SWS). Radar detectors with SWS alert motorists to oncoming emergency vehicles, potential road hazards, and unusual traffic conditions. There are more than 10 million radar detectors with SWS in use nationwide. The federal government has earmarked $2.1 million for further study of the SWS over a three-year period of time. The U.S. Department of Transportation is administering grants to state and local governments to purchase the SWS system and study its effectiveness (for example, in the form of SWS transmitters for school buses and emergency vehicles). The drivers of Virginia deserve the right to the important safety benefits that SWS delivers.

Please sign this petition and help repeal this ban and give drivers in Virginia the freedom to use their property legally:

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/repeal-the-virginia-radar-detector-ban</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you may know, Virginia is the only state that bans the use and sale of detectors. There is no evidence that the detector ban increases highway safety. Our nation’s fatality rates have fallen consistently for almost two decades. Virginia’s fatality rate has also fallen, but not any more dramatically than it has nationwide. Research has even shown that radar detector owners have a lower accident rate than motorists who do not own a detector. </p>
<p>Maintaining the ban is not in the best interest of Virginians or visitors to the state. I know and know of people that will not drive in Virginia due to this ban. Unjust enforcement practices are not unheard of, and radar detectors can keep safe motorists from being exploited by abusive speed traps. Likewise, the ban has a negative impact on Virginia’s business community. Electronic distributors lose business to neighboring states and Virginia misses out on valuable sales tax revenue. </p>
<p>Radar detector bans do not work. Research and experience show that radar detector bans do not result in lower accident rates, improved speed-limit compliance or reduce auto insurance expenditures.<br />
• The Virginia radar detector ban is difficult and expensive to enforce. The Virginia ban diverts precious law enforcement resources from more important duties.<br />
• Radar detectors are legal in the rest of the nation, in all 49 other states. In fact, the first state to test a radar detector ban, Connecticut, repealed the law – it ruled the law was ineffective and unfair. It is time for our Virginia to join the rest of the nation.<br />
• It has never been shown that radar detectors cause accidents or even encourage motorists to drive faster than they would otherwise. The Yankelovich – Clancy – Shulman Radar Detector Study conducted in 1987, showed that radar detector users drove an average of 34% further between accidents (233,933 miles versus 174,554 miles) than non radar detector users. The study also showed that they have much higher seat belt use compliance. If drivers with radar detectors have fewer accidents, it follows that they have reduced insurance costs – it is counterproductive to ban radar detectors.<br />
• In a similar study performed in Great Britain by MORI in 2001 the summary reports that &#8220;Users (of radar detectors) appear to travel 50% further between accidents than non-users. In this survey the users interviewed traveling on average 217,353 miles between accidents compared to 143,401 miles between accidents of those non-users randomly drawn from the general public.&#8221; The MORI study also reported &#8220;Three quarters agree, perhaps unsurprisingly, that since purchasing a radar detector they have become more conscious about keeping to the speed limit&#8230;&#8221; and &#8220;Three in five detector users claim to have become a safer driver since purchasing a detector.&#8221;<br />
• Modern radar detectors play a significant role in preventing accidents and laying the technology foundation for the Safety Warning System® (SWS). Radar detectors with SWS alert motorists to oncoming emergency vehicles, potential road hazards, and unusual traffic conditions. There are more than 10 million radar detectors with SWS in use nationwide. The federal government has earmarked $2.1 million for further study of the SWS over a three-year period of time. The U.S. Department of Transportation is administering grants to state and local governments to purchase the SWS system and study its effectiveness (for example, in the form of SWS transmitters for school buses and emergency vehicles). The drivers of Virginia deserve the right to the important safety benefits that SWS delivers.</p>
<p>Please sign this petition and help repeal this ban and give drivers in Virginia the freedom to use their property legally:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/repeal-the-virginia-radar-detector-ban" rel="nofollow">http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/repeal-the-virginia-radar-detector-ban</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snickers62</title>
		<link>http://highway58speedtrap.com/comment-page-3/#comment-691</link>
		<dc:creator>Snickers62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 23:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://highway58speedtrap.com/?page_id=7#comment-691</guid>
		<description>I was stopped by a Fairfax County Cop one night at about 3:00 am. He said I was doing 50mph in 35mph zone. I saw a car coming up behind me at a high rate of speed in the left lane. I moved to the right and he stayed behind me and turned on his lights. He said the he had paced me at 50mph over a distance of less than half of a mile. When I stopped and he came to my window and said he paced me at 50mph, I told that I might have been doing 40mph.
He kept saying that I was doing 50mph, I looked at him and said, you&#039;re crazy too bud!!!...He backed down at that point and let me go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was stopped by a Fairfax County Cop one night at about 3:00 am. He said I was doing 50mph in 35mph zone. I saw a car coming up behind me at a high rate of speed in the left lane. I moved to the right and he stayed behind me and turned on his lights. He said the he had paced me at 50mph over a distance of less than half of a mile. When I stopped and he came to my window and said he paced me at 50mph, I told that I might have been doing 40mph.<br />
He kept saying that I was doing 50mph, I looked at him and said, you&#8217;re crazy too bud!!!&#8230;He backed down at that point and let me go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://highway58speedtrap.com/comment-page-3/#comment-675</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 22:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://highway58speedtrap.com/?page_id=7#comment-675</guid>
		<description>angel,
i had not seen the &#039;red&#039; ink, no.
i think when we looked back in january they were up by quite a bit.
guess the lost revenue from pacing tickets hurt.
thanks for the update</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>angel,<br />
i had not seen the &#8216;red&#8217; ink, no.<br />
i think when we looked back in january they were up by quite a bit.<br />
guess the lost revenue from pacing tickets hurt.<br />
thanks for the update</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: angel</title>
		<link>http://highway58speedtrap.com/comment-page-3/#comment-674</link>
		<dc:creator>angel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 21:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://highway58speedtrap.com/?page_id=7#comment-674</guid>
		<description>well , dont know if youll see this or not but after just reading the paper and seeing LaCrosse is in the RED for 66,000 +/- ..
 I guess we all need to be very careful drivng threw there cause they will be told to write more and more tickets now..
 woder how the courts are doing now since they are short there now since some have left for better jobs.
  also just wanted to say Great job and knew that it would be dropped before court.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well , dont know if youll see this or not but after just reading the paper and seeing LaCrosse is in the RED for 66,000 +/- ..<br />
 I guess we all need to be very careful drivng threw there cause they will be told to write more and more tickets now..<br />
 woder how the courts are doing now since they are short there now since some have left for better jobs.<br />
  also just wanted to say Great job and knew that it would be dropped before court.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ron</title>
		<link>http://highway58speedtrap.com/comment-page-3/#comment-250</link>
		<dc:creator>ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 17:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://highway58speedtrap.com/?page_id=7#comment-250</guid>
		<description>i was stopped twice last year on rt 58, emporia, va.
mass plates.
one ticket was going east 72 in a 60.
i don&#039;t dispute that one.

second ticket was while driving west in emporia, 78 in a 60.
no way i was going that fast.
i had my radar detector on and on the floor.
the detector did not go off at all.
got swallowed up and spit out by a pack of fast moving traffic.
i did not see him anywhere near the highway.

zeroed in on me right away.
i suspect he had a radar detector detector.
then made up the speed just shy of the reckless driving limit.


told me to give him the radar detector.
i gave it to him.
i had read stories about police foot stomping detectors in va.
i knew that he could not destroy or take my detector without a hearing.
he then gave it back, plus a 40 dollar ticket for having detector, and a 160 ticket for the speed.
did not contest, since it is 500 mile round trip to my home state of delaware, where i am now living again.

i admire what you have done, it is hard to take a ticket when you know they are lying.
i have always kept a camera in my glove box while living in the &quot;masshole&quot; state. (for all the people who run into you)

i like your idea about the video audio recorder.
almost as good as DNA.
hard to dispute documentary evidence.

watch out for the speed traps at the delaware beaches, oc maryland etc. just do the limit or you are caught. 24/7.

ron</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i was stopped twice last year on rt 58, emporia, va.<br />
mass plates.<br />
one ticket was going east 72 in a 60.<br />
i don&#8217;t dispute that one.</p>
<p>second ticket was while driving west in emporia, 78 in a 60.<br />
no way i was going that fast.<br />
i had my radar detector on and on the floor.<br />
the detector did not go off at all.<br />
got swallowed up and spit out by a pack of fast moving traffic.<br />
i did not see him anywhere near the highway.</p>
<p>zeroed in on me right away.<br />
i suspect he had a radar detector detector.<br />
then made up the speed just shy of the reckless driving limit.</p>
<p>told me to give him the radar detector.<br />
i gave it to him.<br />
i had read stories about police foot stomping detectors in va.<br />
i knew that he could not destroy or take my detector without a hearing.<br />
he then gave it back, plus a 40 dollar ticket for having detector, and a 160 ticket for the speed.<br />
did not contest, since it is 500 mile round trip to my home state of delaware, where i am now living again.</p>
<p>i admire what you have done, it is hard to take a ticket when you know they are lying.<br />
i have always kept a camera in my glove box while living in the &#8220;masshole&#8221; state. (for all the people who run into you)</p>
<p>i like your idea about the video audio recorder.<br />
almost as good as DNA.<br />
hard to dispute documentary evidence.</p>
<p>watch out for the speed traps at the delaware beaches, oc maryland etc. just do the limit or you are caught. 24/7.</p>
<p>ron</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://highway58speedtrap.com/comment-page-3/#comment-232</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 03:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://highway58speedtrap.com/?page_id=7#comment-232</guid>
		<description>Just take a look at this video where rogue cops beat a University of Maryland student when he did not attacked them or do anything wrong. He was just celebrating that his team won and danced at the sidewalk. Many officers jumped at him and beat him up -the video shows physical marks- warning, graphic.

They violated his constitutional rights and lied to cover up the story. The video you see was taken from a cell phone. I hope these animals who did this to him pay with their freedoms and can never ever ever again become cops. There&#039;s already one suspended and criminals federal and state charges are pending as well as against the other cops.  A shame truly. 

If this could happen to a law-abiding college student who did not break the law, it can happen to anyone and if no one recorded the incident the judge would have given the sob cops who beat him the case. 

http://www.nypost.com/video?vxSiteId=fe3e21a8-49f1-4cec-9ba5-cfe372fa6572&amp;vxChannel=PostUsFeed&amp;vxClipId=1458_911099&amp;vxBitrate=700</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just take a look at this video where rogue cops beat a University of Maryland student when he did not attacked them or do anything wrong. He was just celebrating that his team won and danced at the sidewalk. Many officers jumped at him and beat him up -the video shows physical marks- warning, graphic.</p>
<p>They violated his constitutional rights and lied to cover up the story. The video you see was taken from a cell phone. I hope these animals who did this to him pay with their freedoms and can never ever ever again become cops. There&#8217;s already one suspended and criminals federal and state charges are pending as well as against the other cops.  A shame truly. </p>
<p>If this could happen to a law-abiding college student who did not break the law, it can happen to anyone and if no one recorded the incident the judge would have given the sob cops who beat him the case. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.nypost.com/video?vxSiteId=fe3e21a8-49f1-4cec-9ba5-cfe372fa6572&amp;vxChannel=PostUsFeed&amp;vxClipId=1458_911099&amp;vxBitrate=700" rel="nofollow">http://www.nypost.com/video?vxSiteId=fe3e21a8-49f1-4cec-9ba5-cfe372fa6572&amp;vxChannel=PostUsFeed&amp;vxClipId=1458_911099&amp;vxBitrate=700</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://highway58speedtrap.com/comment-page-3/#comment-231</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 12:49:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://highway58speedtrap.com/?page_id=7#comment-231</guid>
		<description>thanks for the thoughts george
yes, i would concur if anyone wanted to request the dash cams through foi
thanks for the other thoughts, and we all do know the answer if very many people knew this was going on, at least if
they read all of my site, and all the facts about the charges being dropped
thanks again</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for the thoughts george<br />
yes, i would concur if anyone wanted to request the dash cams through foi<br />
thanks for the other thoughts, and we all do know the answer if very many people knew this was going on, at least if<br />
they read all of my site, and all the facts about the charges being dropped<br />
thanks again</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://highway58speedtrap.com/comment-page-3/#comment-230</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 04:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://highway58speedtrap.com/?page_id=7#comment-230</guid>
		<description>http://stopcopviolence.webs.com/

I’d love it if the above site were to be checked out. This is a site I just made to prevent cop abuse and this fits right in. Thanks! (Yeah posted in wrong place earlier haha)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://stopcopviolence.webs.com/" rel="nofollow">http://stopcopviolence.webs.com/</a></p>
<p>I’d love it if the above site were to be checked out. This is a site I just made to prevent cop abuse and this fits right in. Thanks! (Yeah posted in wrong place earlier haha)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://highway58speedtrap.com/comment-page-3/#comment-228</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 01:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://highway58speedtrap.com/?page_id=7#comment-228</guid>
		<description>Congratulations on the dismissal.  It&#039;s nice that the local press covered the situation.  Has the local press FOI&#039;d the officer&#039;s windshield video to compare with the various scenarios?  I know you do not need the video; would you concur if someone else requested it?

The prosecutor may have limited her exposure by dropping your charges, but she still has the dilemma of all her prosecutions and fines collected for violations outside the Lacrosse PD jurisdiction.  As she is a member of the bar, I am not sure she has the discretion to ignore the town&#039;s fradulent revenues.

An then, if Lacrosse keeps this up, there is always the possibility the State troopers might set up in SH from time to time to ticket the Lacrosse PD when they are speeding outside their jurisdiction without due cause, e.g. witnessing someone allegedly speeding outside their town and that might, but has not yet sped within their jurisdiction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations on the dismissal.  It&#8217;s nice that the local press covered the situation.  Has the local press FOI&#8217;d the officer&#8217;s windshield video to compare with the various scenarios?  I know you do not need the video; would you concur if someone else requested it?</p>
<p>The prosecutor may have limited her exposure by dropping your charges, but she still has the dilemma of all her prosecutions and fines collected for violations outside the Lacrosse PD jurisdiction.  As she is a member of the bar, I am not sure she has the discretion to ignore the town&#8217;s fradulent revenues.</p>
<p>An then, if Lacrosse keeps this up, there is always the possibility the State troopers might set up in SH from time to time to ticket the Lacrosse PD when they are speeding outside their jurisdiction without due cause, e.g. witnessing someone allegedly speeding outside their town and that might, but has not yet sped within their jurisdiction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://highway58speedtrap.com/comment-page-3/#comment-226</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://highway58speedtrap.com/?page_id=7#comment-226</guid>
		<description>the commonwealth attorney dropped everything a month before court.
of course, i was at their courthouse, making copies of recent tickets to validate the $$$ these tickets bring in, and someone there called the C.A. and she actually came down to meet me, and tell me everything was &#039;being dropped&#039; because she did not like the &#039;idea of pacing&#039;
funny though, how she also said she had NEVER watched my videos, but had heard about them and the website, and of course my stack of photo copied tickets was just sitting there, with some pretty amazing &#039;forensic evidence&#039; i have not discussed until now.
95% of all tickets were written to out of state tags.
hundreds of tickets were being written monthly, and 95% of those were all between 61-64 mph, almost to the point of hilarity.
95% of the people just sent their money in, and or had a local attorney come to court to plead their case, and also paid for an online traffic course.  
do you think anyone in the town really knew this was going on?
like the police, the police chief, the attorneys and judges?
the revenue from these tickets and the resulting fines being paid, is GREAT revenue for these little towns.
stunning, to say the least.
thank God i had my camera, and the cop was reasonable, or it would have been just my word (and a NASA scientist) against his, the judge, the police chief, and the commonwealth attorney.
who would have won that little soiree you think?
just sayin&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the commonwealth attorney dropped everything a month before court.<br />
of course, i was at their courthouse, making copies of recent tickets to validate the $$$ these tickets bring in, and someone there called the C.A. and she actually came down to meet me, and tell me everything was &#8216;being dropped&#8217; because she did not like the &#8216;idea of pacing&#8217;<br />
funny though, how she also said she had NEVER watched my videos, but had heard about them and the website, and of course my stack of photo copied tickets was just sitting there, with some pretty amazing &#8216;forensic evidence&#8217; i have not discussed until now.<br />
95% of all tickets were written to out of state tags.<br />
hundreds of tickets were being written monthly, and 95% of those were all between 61-64 mph, almost to the point of hilarity.<br />
95% of the people just sent their money in, and or had a local attorney come to court to plead their case, and also paid for an online traffic course.<br />
do you think anyone in the town really knew this was going on?<br />
like the police, the police chief, the attorneys and judges?<br />
the revenue from these tickets and the resulting fines being paid, is GREAT revenue for these little towns.<br />
stunning, to say the least.<br />
thank God i had my camera, and the cop was reasonable, or it would have been just my word (and a NASA scientist) against his, the judge, the police chief, and the commonwealth attorney.<br />
who would have won that little soiree you think?<br />
just sayin&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Object Caching 579/579 objects using disk

Served from: highway58speedtrap.com @ 2010-09-05 14:40:39 -->